Wednesday, 11 March 2020

Mosul: The Great City Malcolm Turnbull and Australia’s Bombs, A Sense of Place Magazine, 11 March, 2020.



Mosul: The Great City

Malcolm Turnbull and Australia’s Bombs


Mar 11 · 6 min read

Mosul. Image ABC.

FROM Malcolm Turnbull’s first day as Prime Minister in 2015 the bombings on Iraq increased.
That is, not to put too fine a point on things, he was responsible for killing more Muslims than any other prime minister in Australian history.
For years, putrid skeletons were being dug out of the rubble.
Lovers, sons and daughters, soldiers old and young, men and women, children. Most of all, believers in an Abrahamic god, Allah.
On both sides of the conflict they died in their thousands for their beliefs; in a modern day Crusader War which, like its predecessor, would echo down the centuries. Or for a soldier’s wage: the simple, urgent need to support their families in the collapsed economy of Iraq.
As journalist Nicholas Stuart wrote in The Sydney Morning Herald:
I can still smell the filth, the lingering odour of death (think vomit plus defecation) that seeped up from under fallen masonry blocking the street. I can still see, in the houses, the scattered detritus of clothes and baby toys, the remains of lives torn apart by horror.
No glory there, watching Iraqi people dying senselessly while our planes flew overhead.
None, either, amongst the confusion of militias, each attempting to rule their own tiny patch of land according to the one true faith, whichever it happened to be at that particular moment of time; Shia or Sunni, Orthodox or Catholic, animist, nationalist or, when all else failed, simply a lust for power and money.
Australian bombs helped make those corpses.
The ill-informed general public, betrayed both by the nation’s politicians and a heavily dumbed-down media, thought about these deaths for not one second.
Certainly not the editors at the warmongering Murdoch rags; nor the national broadcaster, which could not claw itself away from gay marriage and climate change long enough to notice thousands of bodies rotting in the rubble of some far-off place.
Even when Australian taxpayers had been ripped off for billions to contribute to this massive military debacle.
In a thunderclap of seismic proportions, the psychic echoes of a blood-drenched conflict could be heard across the world. By anyone who cared to listen.
The previous prime minister, the Jesuit-trained Tony Abbott, reliving the Crusades, was responsible for dropping 669 bombs on Iraq and Syria between September, 2014, when he announced he was taking Australia back into the Iraq War, and September 2015, when he was turfed from office. No amount of security theatre or military posturing would save his dismal prime-ministership.
Ditto his successor.
The number of bomb drops began to increase immediately after Malcolm Turnbull seized power. Despite requests, no explanation was forthcoming from either the Prime Minister’s Office or the Defence Department.
On gaining office in Canada, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced his country would cease aerial bombardment.
No such humanitarian commitment came from Australia’s Prime Minister. The bombs were estimated to range in size between 225 and 2000 pounds with a blast radius which could take out a city block.
By April of 2017 Turnbull had been responsible for dropping 1256 bombs.
In May of that year the bombing increased still further, with 119 bomb drops on Iraq, a further 106 in June and 104 in July.
Dodging around legal definitions of war crimes could not hide the truth: these actions were profoundly irresponsible and those who were silent complicit in the outrage.
By the end of the year the claim was that Islamic State had been defeated. Others, better informed, argued that the profound slaughter and martyrdom of its followers, courtesy of American and Australian bombs, was in itself a jihad trap. Experts warned that Islamic State, far from being defeated, had created a major jihad spectacle in order to drive recruitment.
For this ludicrous level of strategic incompetence someone had to go to work in a factory and pay their taxes. While the prime minister grinned and gripped his way through another insincere day.
Military analysts warned that, far from the media cartoon simplicity coverage of good versus evil, the brutal nature of the Mosul occupation and the virtual carpet bombing of so much of the Middle East was counterproductive, fueling jihad sentiment worldwide.
Australian politicians paid no heed.
And wasted billions of dollars, only to make a difficult situation worse while the cultural legacy of Islamic State, including its thousands of videos and often powerful propaganda, would live on for generations.
It was a story which should have been staining the soul of the West, and the conscience of Australian citizens, if they had not all been trapped in a zombie zone of television soaps or raucous conviviality, looking everywhere but at the face of history.
Overlapping the site of Nineveh, once the largest, most populous and advanced city in the world — “the great city”, as the Bible called it — the pulverising of Mosul and the massacre of its citizens held echoes from the past; and the consequences of these 21st Century slaughters would transmit down future centuries. The prophetic methodology.
There was clearly, even viewed from the other side of the world in the heavily censored environment that was Australia, an occult aspect to it all.
The creation myths of the Assyrian empire, existing as early as the 25th Century BC and of which Nineveh was a major capital, saw the universe beginning in war. This was a cosmology echoed by Islamic State, as reporter James Verini recounted in his stunning book They Will Have To Die Now: Mosul and the Fall of the Caliphate:
Existence began in war and through war it was perpetuated. Theirs was a creatio continua, and it was the responsibility of the Assyrian king to carry on the work of creation, to perpetuate the order the gods had introduced at time’s beginning.
He did this through combat. It was official explanation and sacred rite. It was the means by which he communicated with the divine, connecting reality to myth, present to past, god to man. To the Assyrians, in other words, all war was holy — all war that they waged, at least — and holiness was warlike, to a degree that is hard to fathom for us today, even with the presence of movements such as the Islamic State.
Splendid, too, was torture, which the Assyrian kings looked on as strategic propaganda and sacrificial ritual. Impaling, dismembering, disemboweling, flaying, beheading. The surviving historic friezes celebrated them all, especially beheading.
As Verini records, in the books of the Old Testament the city is a byword for peerless cruelty: “What the prophets feel in the face of Assyrian abuse is not so much anger as shame, or the white-hot anger that can only come of shame — the shame of men abandoned by their maker.”
Sure as night follows day, there would be a very high price to pay for the killing, beyond the already astronomical costs in terms of military expenditure and crackdowns on civil liberties.
The dead haunt the living.
For Malcolm Turnbull it had already arrived, the haunting for a man who stained the soul of the country and betrayed the people he was elected to represent.
It wasn’t long into his tenure before the prime minister’s appearance and disposition — that of a wealthy, successful, chipper, bon vivant, well-fed eastern suburbs success story — changed; his demeanour became more authoritarian, his face more sinister, more Mussolini-like, starkly lined, and his glib reiterations of government policy more patently false.
For the person most directly responsible for Australia’s killing of Muslim fighters and their families on the other side of the world, the blood of the martyrs was congealing around Turnbull, whether he liked it or not, understood it or not.
It all led straight to the pit. Turnbull left office a pariah in his own party and a joke in the electorate. Men pursue power, and power destroys them.



This is an extract from John Stapleton’s upcoming book Dark Dark Policing.





A Sense of Place Magazine


Books, Publishing, Writing, Photography

Tuesday, 3 March 2020

Betrayal of the People: Extract from Dark Dark Policing, A Sense of Place Magazine, 3 March, 2020.

Betrayal of the People

Extract from Dark Dark Policing

Mar 3 · 7 min read
Image: Courtesy Flight Network
Everyone felt like a stranger now.
The announcement came, the legendary Kidman properties, spanning three states and the Northern Territory, reportedly some 2.6 per cent of the nation’s land area, 101,000 square kilometres, was being sold to a Chinese consortium with Australia’s richest woman, Gina Rinehart, as the local figurehead.
Then Treasurer Scott Morrison, always closely linked to the Very Big End of Town, approved the sale, essentially to the Chinese Communist Party, declaring: “I have decided that the acquisition of Kidman as proposed would not be contrary to the national interest.”
Scott Morrison, the man who flogged off more than 2 percent of the country in one rotten deal that could only be described as a grievous breach of sovereignty, would soon enough be Prime Minister; the top office nothing but a revolving door rewarding the most Machiavellian of the nation’s politicians.
The sale was perceived by its many critics as an insult to all Australian taxpayers, an insult to the indigenous people whose sacred lands the properties had once been, and an insult to the generations who built the country.
Steal an asset that was never yours, make it your own, then sell to the highest bidder, no matter who they are. Capitalism. A wonderful thing.
Australian politicians. A case study of the worst that crony capitalism has to offer. The country had sold its soul, and its greatest assets.
“Could there be a greater betrayal?” Clive Hamilton asked in his recent book Silent Invasion: Chinese Influence in Australia.
Well no, there could not.
Australian democracy is in very serious jeopardy. China is making great strides towards it and its intentions are not benevolent. It’s obvious in local, regional and global trends and if we do not do something soon to protect our freedoms they are going to be sold into the burgeoning Chinese empire, as well as political hegemony, by a corrupt oligarchy.
After decades of stupidly pro-cyclical policy-making Australia is now little more than a southern province of Chinese economic policy. With the flick of a pen in an obscure public service department, China delivers tens of billions to our shores in coal revenues and our monumental trade deficit evaporates overnight.
There is no other economy on earth that I know of that works with this dependence. We call it lucky. And it is. But it also comes with strings attached and they have been on display for a decade or more.
Indeed, with the current crop of money-grubbing mock-libertarian ideologues in charge, we are a complete bloody pushover. [2]
The idiosyncratic crossbencher Bob Katter, from the far north Queensland seat of Kennedy, said he felt “absolute rage and disgust” over the sale and the government was “selling their country out and selling their country off”.
“I would not describe the people in the major political parties as Australians — who knows what they are? — but they are not Australians,” he said. “These low bastards are sneaking through the approval two weeks prior to Christmas, when the public are looking elsewhere.
“Fifty-one per cent of Australia’s land mass is registered as desert lands, 21 per cent is Aboriginal lands without title deeds, precluding pastoral activity, and 7 per cent is national parks, leaving only 25 per cent available for agriculture. Australia’s five biggest farming operations — the Ord Stage 2, Van Diemen’s dairies, Cubbie, Nicoletti grains and Terra Firma — are all foreign-owned. They gave, not sold, the Ord River to the Chinese. Stage 3 along with Stage 2 will easily be the biggest farming operation in Australian history.
“The country continues to be sold out. When you’ve been a member of parliament for 42 years you can smell a rat from a mile away and this rat is very, very smelly indeed,” Katter complained.
The Foreign Investment Review Board approved the sale.
Fat cats hunkered down in their air-conditioned streets as they passed fashionable city restaurants, a glowing air of satisfaction wreathing their outsized bodies.
“What is the use of the Foreign Investment Review Board?” Old Alex asked. “They stand in the way of nothing. They approve the sale of the country to foreign interests.”
“Madness,” Boris said.
“They’ve sold off most of the electricity infrastructure, including light-poles, for Christ’s sake. China now has the capacity to shut down our electricity grid. Much of the prime rural and urban real estate has been sold to China. They’ve sold off most of the country’s major ports — Melbourne, the biggest, Darwin, the most strategic.
At the time the new owner, billionaire Ye Cheng, claimed the Darwin port deal was “our involvement in One Belt, One Road”. This was discounted by some commentators as hyperbole, an attempt to curry favour with the Chinese Government.
But now, by design or not, the Darwin port deal increasingly looks like a blueprint for how Chinese interests can take control of foreign ports — as it is doing by various means around the world — without arousing local opposition. Quite the reverse. All levels of Australian government have encouraged it.[3]
As John Garrick, a senior lecturer at Charles Darwin University, wrote in the news outlet Crikey, Landbridge Australia, a subsidiary of Shandong Landbridge, won the 99-year lease with its bid of $A506 million in November 2015. Shandong Landbridge has substantial and varied interests including port logistics and petrochemicals. Though privately owned, like many Chinese companies it has strong ties to the ruling Chinese Communist Party.
The company knows how to cultivate political connections. In Australia it gave influential Liberal Party figure and former trade minister Andrew Robb an $880,000 job just months after he retired from parliament.
The bid for the port was examined and approved by the Foreign Investments Review Board, the Defence Department and ASIO.
Weaknesses in Australian governments at all levels have been revealed. They have been reactive, readily accepting the lure of pearls cast on our shores.[4]
It was hard to believe just how bastardised Australian politics had become, just how great the betrayal of the country, how blatantly corrupt the greed of the conservatives. Masquerading as representatives of the people while feathering your own and your mates’ nests at the cost of the nation’s sovereignty, that’s not just dishonest, that’s corruption.
“It’s become so blatant, they don’t even bother to hide it any more,” an old mate observed.
“We’re becoming a southern province of China,” Old Alex said, repeating an article he had just read, as Boris, Bruce and he drank their lamentable coffee. Even at eight in the morning gusts of heat were descending on the street. “What sort of country does this, allows this to happen?”
“Madness,” Boris said again. “What can you do?”
Powerless. Ennui. Nothing stuck. Nobody cared. Nobody had a stake in their own country any more. It had all been flogged off to the highest bidder; and the locals made peasants in their own country. They despaired, left the country, retreated into their own parochial lives. Paid no attention whatsoever to the daily news.
With the recession already cutting in these canary towns, there was nothing you could do about such a profoundly mismanaged country.
Within months that fat cat of fat cats, David Irvine, the former director-general of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation and the Australian Secret Intelligence Service took over as head of the Foreign Investment Review Board.
On magnificent salaries, their paid man always sang from the institutional song sheet as he swung from one magnificent bureaucratic post to the next.
“That’s what these people do,” a retired spook told him. “They pass these plum jobs between themselves.”
Irvine had left ASIO singing the bureaucratic myths, the value of multiculturalism, the value of the government’s solid relationship with the Islamic community. It was all a lie. Multiculturalism, cultural Marxism by any other name, was an academic theory aimed at destroying the hegemony of the mainstream culture. It had been imposed on the populace by useful idiots. The Australian Government had profoundly mismanaged immigration. The billions of dollars ripped off the backs of the working poor to propagandise the theory had turned a successful immigrant country into a floundering, soulless, polyglot nation without a core, a unifying history or a common identity. And therefore without national pride.
In the process standards of living and social cohesion had been destroyed.
All to benefit the rich.
The country had never been more ethnically divided or demoralised. And as for the relationship with the Islamic community, it could not have been worse.
But the myths rolled on.
Irvine entered the Foreign Investment Review Board once again singing from the song sheet:
“Australia welcomes foreign investment, foreign investment in the national interest … and I don’t see that changing,” Irvine said on his appointment.
The people were robbed on a daily basis, their country sold out from under them.
While the useful prats sang and sang and sang.
Western NSW. Image courtesy Camplify

A Sense of Place Magazine